People Don’t Read, People Don’t Listen!

not-listen

Have you noticed how often important details are not read in your emails? Or when you know you said something that the other person said you didn’t say that? Or how often you have to repeat more than once deadlines others need to keep if there is any hope that they will? Don’t think that you are alone! People Don’t Read, People Don’t Listen. And it is getting worse! But don’t despair, there are things you can do to increase the likelihood that what you say and write will be heard and acted upon. But the responsibility is on YOU to make it happen, or it won’t happen.  Let’s first look at the “WHY” these things happen so often, then the “WHAT” and “HOW” to fix the problem.

First of all, the problem relates to the massive amount of information all of us are handling, and the many ways in which it bombards us. Many have learned that the only way to manage this is to filter, and in filtering, we often miss important details. For example, when we send an email letting someone else know when we are available, and they call at the time we are Not available. Even if they read the correct information in our email, they call when it is convenient for them, and fail to review the details in our email. So many productivity problems and wasted time occurs because of this.

Another reason for the problem is lack of focus. Most people are balancing so many balls in the air at once, many of those balls relating to conflicting priorities, that lack of prioritizing occurs. What pops up as urgent is what is handled at the time, which is not necessarily what should be the priority.

And how often do you have to follow up one time too many, or what needs to get done, doesn’t? I am reminded of a CEO I worked with years ago, who said more times than I can count, that if he expected something to be done, he had to monitor, follow up, and then it MIGHT get done. He sent more than one email about it. He knew that if he didn’t monitor, and follow up, that what he expected to be done would not happen. He accepted the responsibility to remind his direct reports, to monitor, and to follow up. He didn’t complain about it, he didn’t place the responsibility on others; he assumed the responsibility to keep the focus on what was important. This lesson you taught me, Render, stays with me to this day.

If you are a CEO or a Director in an organization with a lot of responsibility, your main job functions are that of choreographer and coordinator. If you are spending too much time doing, you are out of your league. Your main job is to enable others to do their job. This takes many forms, but none of these is that you are the “doer.”   Your job is to facilitate others to do.

Never forget that others are watching you, and taking their lead from what you do. Are you doing the right things? Are you modeling the right behaviors? Well, of course, some of you are, and others of you aren’t, and those in both groups know who they are.

Where are you in this mix? More importantly, where do you need/want to be, and how will you get there?

Think about it. Then do it.

Patti signature

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Responding, Not Reacting

unnamed

Being defensive is one of the most ineffective behaviors we can exhibit. Unfortunately this behavior is all too common. It is much more effective to respond, not react, even when what we are hearing or feeling could trigger defensiveness in us. So, yes, the feeling of defensiveness can be normal. We can feel defensive, but we do not have to act upon those feelings. Surely as adults we know that we don’t have to act out all of our feelings, especially those that aren’t going to be productive. But what are some tips and strategies that can help us with this? There are several.

It should first be noted that it is hard to not act defensively when we feel defensive, so we should first reframe what we are feeling. Take a deep breath, pause, and think about an appropriate response. Depersonalize it. Assume that what you are hearing isn’t intended to create defensiveness, or any negative emotion. Convince yourself that the other person has good intent, just isn’t able to communicate as effectively as would be preferred. Assume the position of a mature and in control (not controlling) person, one who wants to be a problem solver with the other person. Ask a question, don’t make a statement. A question that can be asked is a question asking for information. For example, someone might say, “You aren’t listening to me!” A defensive response would be, “Yes, I am!” said in a reactionary tone of voice. Instead of making a reactionary statement, a question that could be asked is, “What did I say or do that gave the impression that I am not listening?” There are other ways this question could be asked, but I recommend this approach. The other person should hear that you want to understand what you did, not what they heard, with the focus on you, not them. Now, this may not work with a truly hostile person, but probably nothing else will either.

Don’t make the communication a debate. Don’t try to win. First understand, and then search for mutual understanding, not necessarily agreement. Don’t try to be right. Be careful with the words you use. Use neutral words, and unemotional words. Verbalize thoughts, not feelings. This does not mean that feelings are wrong and should never be discussed, but initially discuss thoughts. When feelings are discussed the conversation becomes more emotional and it will be difficult for either person to not feel or act defensive. Say, “I think,” or “I am concerned about,” not “I feel that.” Some people use “feeling” language to describe thoughts, and even when that is clear to the other person, the words “feel” or “feeling” can make the conversation emotional.

Own your own thoughts, and describe or discuss those, allowing the other person to do the same. So do not say, “You accuse me of not listening when I am!” Instead say something like, “When I hear someone say (and the word “someone” instead of “you” is intentional) I am not listening and I think (not “know”) I am, that is difficult for me.”

There are other tips that could be given, but at the risk of over saturating the subject.   This is not intended to be all inclusive, just provide some ways to defuse what can be a defensive act/react event. I will appreciate your thoughts and ideas.

Patti signature

 

 

 

Posted in Relationships | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Facebook Foibles

I admit that I am late to the Facebook party.  Until recently, I only accessed Facebook to see pictures of my grandchildren.  Early this year, I decided to get serious about social media, and as such have been much more involved on Facebook.  Some of what I am seeing and reading concerns me a lot.  And I decided that I can’t ignore this and only complain to likeminded friends any longer.  So, I am asking for more civility on Facebook.  It is possible that civility can reap great personal rewards, and without any loss of one’s beliefs.

First, the easy part.  What is to be gained by posting photos that imply one is drunk, or even partying to excess?  Are these things we want our grandmothers or employers or future employers to see?    And what makes us think we have the right to post photos of others that do not present them in a positive light?  It isn’t funny, and it isn’t nice.  Stop it.  And that is not even recommending that we get permission from others before posting photos of them, even when we see nothing wrong in posting the photos.  And many of us do this, (me too!) most likely without even thinking.  And why would we want would- be- bad people to know we are out of town?  Why not wait until we are back home to post the photos of our ski trip to Colorado?  That would seem safer.

Now for the even harder message.  Stop the negative political and religious messages, which are often coupled with (especially the political postings) profanity.  What makes us think that we should alienate others?  This has nothing to do with whether those “others” agree with our views, or not.  We are in a bad place in our country at this time, especially related to our very polarized political views.  And we have an absolute right to those.  So please, do not misunderstand my message.  It matters not if we are a staunch Republican, a liberal Democrat, a committed Libertarian, or someone who would really like to overthrow the government, regardless of which party is in office.  Why would we want to be so negative and flaming in public about our views?  Why would we take such a risk to offend others, even those we care about?  Do we really think we are going to change anyone’s mind with these postings?  I don’t think so.  Our close friends and family likely already know our politics, and are not going to be moved to agree with our position on these issues due to a Facebook posting.  I believe that most of these rantings are just ventilating, without considering the negative consequences.  Do we consider that someone in our sphere of influence may have the completely opposite opinion about these same issues, and that a not so positive opinion can be formed in their mind of us due to our negative postings?  And this is not about hiding our views, or pretending to be someone that we are not.  It is about being respectful about the views of others.  In the right setting, we can certainly share our opinion about these issues, but why do so in a negative manner in a public forum, and run the risk of alienating others?  Do we really need to do that?  I don’t think so.

And while I am running the risk of alienating some of my readers, let me add that I think the same is  true about weapons.  Many people also have very polarized views about guns and gun control.  But do we really need to be so negative and public about our views regarding guns and gun control?  Are we going to change opinions with strong and negative public emotion?  Again, I don’t think so.

Although I do not reply to the Facebook postings that offend me, I am offended nonetheless.  My political (and other) views may be wrong in your eyes. But they are mine, and I maintain the right to have them without rebuke from others.  So do others.

Just think about it. Let’s all strive to be more civil.

Patti signature

 

Posted in Relationships | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

I See Them Everywhere

I see them at the trampoline as I look out the windows, doing the dishes from breakfast.  I see them in the bathroom, Virginia putting makeup on as I did, and in the perfume atomizer she took apart.  I see them in the board games left on the table, and in the posters they did for their mom who raced today in the Raleigh Rock and Roll half marathon.  I see them in the mounds of laundry, as I gather the clothes they left behind, which I will wash prior to mailing them tomorrow.

They left an hour ago, the three granddaughters and our daughter, for a seven hour drive back to Georgia where they live.  They took a big piece of my heart with them.  I can hear eight year old Elsie say, “Nana, I don’t want to go home!”  10 year old Mary Grace has already called, saying they might be able to stay in Raleigh for three weeks this summer, but ,”We will have to talk to daddy about it.”  This weekend was the end of two weeks with soon to be three year old Virginia, and I can hear “Nana, where are you!?” ringing in my ears.  (I am here, Virginia, but where are you?!) Mary Grace and Elsie and their parents were with us for a week’s vacation and Easter, and then went home for school, leaving Virginia with us since the girls and their mom were coming back to Raleigh this weekend for the marathon.

I can only imagine how my grandmother Grace must have grieved when my mother took me, who was nine years old at the time, from her to live in Virginia.  I had lived in Alabama with my grandmother since I was less than two.  Or how Shirshee, a chosen grandmother to Tara since she was born, must have grieved when I moved from Alabama to North Carolina in 1981, taking five year old Tara with me.  Neither of these grandmothers had the luxury of frequent travel, so there would be many months between their visits with these children they loved.  I can now begin to understand their sense of loss each time they parted.

These granddaughters of ours have lived in Georgia since the first one, Mary Grace, was born and we have lived in Raleigh all those same years.  Yet, I have not missed a month seeing her or the others granddaughters that followed in these now more than ten years.  I made a decision that as long as I was able to I would travel at least monthly to be with them, and I have been so blessed to have been able to do so.  While it hasn’t always been easy, it has been possible, and since it was a commitment, not just an idea, we have made it work.  The partings aren’t any easier, however, even when we know we will be together again within a month.

Just like most of life’s major lessons, we have to experience them to understand them.   I now understand how Grandmother Grace and Shirshee must have felt as they waved goodbye, not knowing for how long.

Patti signature

 

 

 

Posted in Relationships | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments

Time In A Bottle

Our family just returned from a week long ski vacation in Colorado. Our oldest daughter, her husband and two oldest daughters (10 and 8) skied for five days. The others of us, my husband, Mike and youngest daughter, Chatham, and youngest granddaughter, Chatham Virginia, (2.75 years), as well as, our MoMo, a good friend who is like another aunt to the granddaughters, rested and worked. Since I am one who believes that we are “never off duty,” I couldn’t help but find lessons in this family vacation that are directly transferable to the workplace.

Lesson #1 – The importance of role models, even on vacation. Although the skiers would have liked more snow, they found a way to ski regardless. They stretched their limits, and felt proud in the process. I was proud that this daughter with three precious children made herself ski with her husband and oldest daughters, when she clearly had no interest in it, other than to be there with them, and not spoil their fun. So what is the lesson in this? It is simply that we need to role model the behaviors that are important to those whom we lead. In this case, Tara participating in the sport was important to her husband and daughters, and had she not participated, they, and she, would have missed some special times. This was their first ski trip, and Tara showed her family that it is important to try something before deciding that it isn’t for you. Now, this does not mean that if she really doesn’t care for skiing that she should continue to ski regardless. On this first ski trip, however, it was important for her to model behaviors she wanted reinforced, such as risk taking, getting outside one’s comfort zone, and not discounting something just because it is new. This is every bit as important a lesson as telling those same children to “try it, you may like it”, when encouraging them to try a new food that they are resisting.

Now, what is your workplace (or even personal) lesson from this?

Lesson #2 – Time and life fly by, even when you’re having fun, and maybe especially when you’re having fun. When I see how these children are growing and developing, I am amazed at how time goes so quickly. It seems like only yesterday that the oldest, Mary Grace, was crying at the door when we left, and now she leaves us so easily, and the other two younger girls, Elsie and Virginia, cry when they have to leave us. My logical self knows that in fewer years than this Mary Grace will be going off to college, and I will be (hopefully!) in my 70’s. How could it pass so quickly? And in these years, what impression have I made on these precious grandchildren? What will they remember about this time with us, this ski trip? Probably sitting around the table playing games, which they love, and we do so infrequently. One of the lessons from this is that we do not have to take ski trips out west to have great times. Unless we can’t slow down enough at home to do the simple things that bind us together. It is sad but true that the busyness of life gets in the way of the simple things that connect us.

Now, what is your workplace (or even personal) lesson from this?

Lesson #3 – Although it is counterintuitive, making time to slow down reenergizes us. And sometimes it is just a different location, a different change of scenery that energizes us. Mike and Chatham both worked nonstop on this vacation, and still felt like it was (enough of) a vacation. For they were able to work at their own pace, with no distractions from meetings, other than the meetings they scheduled! So although they both worked more than 12 hour days while on this vacation, it still felt like enough of a vacation for them. There were still able to stop to be with the rest of the family for meals and special outings, and felt the peace of the Colorado mountains as one day ran into the other.

Now, what is your workplace (or even personal) lesson from this?

Sometimes it is better to pose the questions than to propose the answers. It is important to find one’s own answers to the questions and the lessons from those that can provide the most value.

I am, of course, very interested in your insights, and your lessons.

 

Patti signature

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Out of Control

For those (of us) who like or need to control, we receive lessons periodically that show us that there are many things that we can’t control.    Our family is experiencing one of those lessons this week.  We planned a Spring Break ski trip to Colorado a year ago, and that trip is now in process.  Regrettably for us, this is a very warm end of winter in Steamboat Springs, Colorado, and there is very little snow.  We are here to ski, well, the children and grandchildren are here to ski, and I am along for the memories! We are having 60 and 70 degree days, and disappointing amounts of snow.  While there is some skiing possible, with the best conditions between 11am-3pm, it isn’t the ski trip out west we envisioned.  Although there is plenty to do here other than ski, we planned this trip for the skiing.  So we are disappointed.  Although several of us more than once have echoed the words, “You can’t control the weather,” I know that we wish we could.

This experience reminds me of other things we can’t control, and some things that we can.  I am reminded of some points I make when speaking and consulting on Communication and Leadership.  Perhaps I need to remember these points as we make the best of this Spring Break vacation.

  1. We have no accountability or control of the response(s) of others. We have absolute accountability and control of what we say and how we say it.  If we communicate effectively, the other person should not react, but we can’t control that.  Regardless of what we say and how we say it, some people will be defensive and react.  How we respond to the defensiveness may at least in part determine whether the reaction gets worse or improves, but not necessarily so.  We should do our best to communicate well, and when the response isn’t what it should be, refuse to let the reaction of the other person pull us down.

 

  1. Relationships change over time, and some of those changes are not what we expect, or what we would prefer. Some friendships can last through all of our life changes, and some can’t.  I have a couple of friends who are more like sisters than friends, and those relationships have survived moves, divorce, remarriage, death, and many other changes, and are still strong after  45 years.  There are other relationships which were once close friendships, but that have not remained so.  Being one who has difficulty letting go of anything (including clothes, stuff, and organizations) I tried to keep those relationships alive, but realized that there wasn’t enough interest from the other person to do so.   I have come to accept that while I can control keeping clothes, stuff and organizations long past their usefulness, I can’t control relationships that have outlived their time.  Keeping relationships alive requires two people, and I can only control one of those people.  So instead of grieving over lost relationships, I can enjoy those relationships that I have, and do my best to make them even stronger.

 

  1. Family relationships are even more complicated than friendships, and have similar issues of control. I am an only child with no living parents.  I have always longed for a close family, and struggle to understand families who “should” be close, and aren’t.  I have finally accepted that “coulda, wouda, shouda doesn’t work with any relationships, including families.  The issues that divide or unite siblings are varied, and even when siblings grown up together in what appears to be a functional family, there is no guarantee that those different people will choose to remain close as adults.  I am thinking of three different families who one would think would have more to unite them than to divide them, yet who are not close as adults, and even less so once the parents are no longer present.  In each case there is at least one sibling who would choose it to be otherwise, yet who has realized that relationships can’t be sustained by wishes to do so that aren’t shared.

What are the lessons from all of this?  For me, there are three that are most important.

  1. While we can’t control the response or other behavior of others, we can, and should control our own.  When the realization is obvious that the relationship has outlived its usefulness, we need to be able to let it go.  While we can hold onto the good memories, we can’t hold on to others who choose to go, be they spouses, friends or family.

 

  1. There are seasons for a reason, and there are seasons of life. If we live long enough we will have seasons of growth, and we will also have seasons when the best we can do is to try to hold on to what we have, for nothing is growing.  In the seasons of growth we should put some things away to carry us through the other seasons.  While we can’t control the seasons, we can control our response, and we can control what we do with our learning from nature’s lessons.

 

  1. One thing we can control is our response to whatever changes we experience. During the good times, we should rejoice in those and share what we have with others.  During the times when we struggle, we can look for the meaning in the struggle, and the lessons provided, and do our best to not need to relive those lessons.

 

Instead of being disappointed or immobilized by unexpected and unwanted changes, we can choose to accept and perhaps even embrace the change.  Instead of snow skiing, our family is off to explore the beauty of all that Steamboat has to offer, which is much more than snow!

Patti signature

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Just Be Nice!

What have you done recently to make someone feel better about themselves? Maya Angelou said it best; “People will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.” My most recent posts have been about communication. This post is also about communication, communication by behavior, and specifically, the behavior of being nice.   Yes, you read that right, being nice. Now, I think most of us know this, but too often we fail to show that we really know it by our behavior.

It is wonderful to be smart, but that will not generate good will in others. Being nice will. Now, I can hear some reading this thinking, “I don’t care if people like me; it matters more to me that I have respect!” Well, even if that is true, being respected and being liked often go hand in hand, and even if they don’t for you, where does respect get us if we aren’t liked? While it may have been easier to accomplish results as an individual in the past, that is no longer as true today. We are living in a team based world, where how we get along with others matters a lot. Yes, even if you are the top dog; and maybe especially if you are the top dog! You may think you are the leader, and you look around and they aren’t following! You are only a leader if you have followers. You may have position power, authority, but that is so different from being a leader. People follow leaders because they want to, not because they have to.

Well, if this is a true scenario for you, pause and look within. How well do you treat others? You may be telling others how smart you are and how incompetent they are, not of course using those words, but they get the point. You may even think, “Why are people so (meaning “ too”) sensitive?” Some people are too sensitive, and need to toughen up, but not most people. Most people respond very well to appreciation and recognition, and benefit greatly from the occasional praise. When we are so focused on results that we fail to remember that life is a human business, we miss the opportunities to make people feel better about themselves. When people feel better about themselves they are able to do better work, which helps us accomplish our goals. That really is how it works easiest and best.

Well, how do we describe being nice? There are so many ways. Smiling, greeting others when we pass them, and calling others by their name are examples. Also, asking others for their opinions, and not replying in a manner that tells them they are wrong. If/when they are wrong, saying so in a manner that maintains the dignity and respect of others. Not calling others out in front of or to others. Using the third party endorsement, which is complimenting someone to another person even when they aren’t present. (If you really aim for a firestorm of good will, try this one. The rumor mill will carry your positive message about others in such a manner that it will generate even more good will.) Use objective and positive words, a pleasant tone of voice, and friendly body language. Avoiding using the “but” word, or when it is used, placing it in a sentence in the proper place. An example of this is, instead of saying, “That is a good idea, but it won’t work here,” say, “While that won’t work here, it is a good idea.” Hopefully you can hear how reversing where the “but” is matters. Usually the person hears and remembers the words that follow the “but,” so when using that word, ordering the words in this manner helps them remember best what you said about them that is positive.

Then there is the power of thank you notes. In an era of explosive email, with even party invitations sent through electronically, do we really need to send (at least important) thank you’s via email? Think about the joy of receiving a handwritten thank you note. When a rare one is discovered in a stack of mail, it is often opened first, for it is known to be something special. My husband recently received 10 personalized thank you notes for a presentation he made to a college class. He was so touched that he left them out on the kitchen counter for me to see, and told me how touched he was to receive them. Now, he has spoken to many college classes, and this is the first time that he has received personalized thank you notes. Of the 10, 8 were handwritten and 2 were typed, and even those two typed notes were signed by the sender, and were in a handwritten envelope, so I consider them all personalized. And, each one was obviously written for his presentation; for they mentioned specific things they received from it. So, they were not “cookie cutter” thank you’s. Now, it is likely that the teacher of the class suggested the notes, which is great, for this represents leadership! That in no way detracts from the power of the notes. Being nice also includes showing appreciation to others in tangible ways, and this is a powerful example.

There is more that I could say about being nice, and more examples that I could give, but I must close. There are a few thank you notes that I want to write that are long overdue. This is about me too!

Patti signature

Posted in Relationships | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

What In The World Were/Are They Thinking?!

For the past few blog posts, we have been discussing Managing Differences through Communication.   In one of those posts we discussed the Golden Rule and the Platinum Rule.  Last week we discussed Listening.  This week we will discuss some of what are too often the undiscussables.  The stimulus for this week’s blog post is the happenings of the SAE fraternity at the University of Oklahoma, which is thankfully (I hope) an uncommon event.  On a broader scale we are discussing how what we think and say can either inspire others, or demean them.

To say that I am troubled about the University of Oklahoma SAE event is a major understatement.  How could this happen in 2015?  I was on the Human Rights Commission (Race Relations) at the University of Virginia in the early 1970’s, and was proud to be able to work on these issues with fellow classmates and faculty.  Graduation came, and I moved on to the deeper south.  I will never forget some of the disrespectful comments that I heard about different ethnic groups, comments that I knew came from ignorance and fear.  And of course, these negative and disrespectful comments were not just being made in the south.  A few years later when I moved to North Carolina, I was appalled to hear that this southern state had been the hotbed of some of the most brutal battles between whites and blacks as late as the 70’s.  Even so, I certainly would never have thought that we would be where we are in 2015 with issues such as what recently occurred in Oklahoma.

Where is our respect for fellow citizens?  Do people have to look like us, think like us and sound like us for us to deem them worthy of respectful treatment?  How do we justify name calling on any level?  We teach our children to not call names; do we not hold ourselves to the (at least) same standard?  Do we think that we can fight the enemies in other places when we can’t get along here at home?  What are we thinking?  Do we really believe that one ethnic group is superior to others?

It is perhaps too easy to point to the most extreme examples of wrongful treatment by others to others, and fail to look within.  For even if we haven’t resorted to name calling, are we really without fault as to what we think of others and how we treat them?  Maybe you are, but I am not.

As a strong willed person (or so I’ve been called many times!) I realize that my passionate responses to others can be heard by them as me being upset, and maybe even angry.  My tone of voice sometimes leaves no question of how I feel about what is being discussed.  My tone of voice and the words that I use can be too direct.  When I inappropriately use “I” and “You” language I can be heard as accusatory or controlling.  Knowing these possibilities of my natural tendencies and being in a position to coach others, often I am on my best behavior and don’t make these mistakes.  But sometimes I fail to catch myself, and my language isn’t what it should be.  Perhaps some of you reading this can identify with my struggle. While I don’t believe that I think I am or feel superior to others, sometimes my language can imply that.  I am most heated when discussing politics.  I need to model Dr. Stephen Covey’s, “Seek First to Understand, then to be Understood.”

I need to remember the following.  Tone of voice is the single most important variable in communicating.  Too often the message is missed due to the tone of voice.  It is important to be direct and clear, but not directive.  While a (too) soft tone of voice can be heard as weak, a loud tone of voice is heard as aggressive.  Avoid offensive words, and this includes any use of profanity. Yes, I realize the use of profanity is common, and I agree that some words are worse than others, but the use of any profanity is unnecessary.

Because of our different personalities we naturally communicate differently.  Some of us get to the point quickly, and some of us “ring around the rosy.”  In the workplace, regardless of our personality, we should get to the point efficiently, but not so quickly that we are perceived as not being friendly.  It is important to not just tell others what we want/need them to know, but to ask their opinion, and show in our response that we are listening.  We should disagree agreeably.  And in all of our interactions it is important to slow down, listen and hear the message the other person is trying to deliver, and without judgment.

It has been said that most of our social problems could be solved with better communication.  The purpose of communication is not to talk, and not even to listen, but to reach mutual understanding.  Too often when communication mishaps occur it is because we are striving for agreement.  While agreement is good when we can reach it, it isn’t always possible to agree.  It is often and perhaps even usually possible to reach mutual understanding.  But not if we think we are better than the other person.  Our thinking precedes our behavior.  If we think we are better than others, that thinking will come through in our behavior, including in our language.  Then comes the name calling, whether it is expressed out loud, or left to germinate in our own heads.

Patti signature

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

I Know You Think You Hear Me, But Are You Really Listening!

Last week’s blog post asked readers to “weigh in” on the Golden Rule and the Platinum Rule, and the Platinum Rule was the clear winner.  Readers made comments on the importance of this subject of communication, and expressed its importance to teamwork. Thanks to all of you who took your time to record your thoughts.  Other bloggers know how valuable comments are!  One reader mentioned the importance of nonverbal communication, the subject of this week’s discussion.

The largest category of nonverbal communication is body language, which includes listening, facial expression, eye contact, body posture, gestures, and distance.  Most of you can visualize an angry person’s body language, as well as the body language of one whose behavior is reflective of someone who is pleasant, open and receptive.  If we were having a verbal conversation, you could describe the exact nonverbal behaviors of these two different people.  Therefore, I won’t go into detail on each of these.  I will focus on the one behavior that often determines whether our behavior in general is perceived as positive or negative by others.  That one behavior is listening.  Now I recognize that most of us think we know how to listen well, when in fact, too often our behavior is reflective of not listening at all, but telling the other person what we want them to know! The three types of listening are passive, selective, and active.  A few descriptive comments about each differentiates these types.

Passive listeners are not engaged in what the other person is saying, either verbally or nonverbally.  With passive listeners there really is no conversation, for they do not make comments, ask questions, or clarify, or if they do, it is only when the other person is totally finished talking.  Now, do not mistake this for good listening, thinking that to comment, ask questions, or clarify is interrupting.  It can be interrupting, which can be so skillfully done that it is positive, not negative.  Also, the nonverbal behavior of the passive listener can range from disinterest to anger, and other negative behaviors that are not as extreme.

Selective listeners zero in on part of the message being delivered, focusing on some details and often missing the main message.  Selective listeners can be perceived as debating, not listening at all.  They may listen for facts and logic, failing to capture the feelings being expressed.   Feelings are as important as facts, and they are not always verbally disclosed.

Active listeners are engaged in hearing what is being said as well as what isn’t being said, but that which is also involved.  Active listeners listen for feelings as well as facts.  Active listeners are skilled at asking questions, clarifying, and summarizing.  They listen for the main idea(s) and separate details that aren’t important from those that are.  The body language of the active listener shows respect, interest and receptivity.

We can assume that active listening is the best type of listening, and should strive to make sure there is consistency between our verbal and nonverbal behavior.  But active listening alone does not insure that we will be perceived as being an effective listener.  There are some behaviors to avoid when we are actively listening.  These behaviors are Avoiding, Judging, and Solving.

Avoiding is failing to verbally address the parts of the message that make us uncomfortable.  An example of this is the friend who is verbalizing what they interpret as facts that are not really facts, but instead are feelings.  The receiver of these “facts” may fail to discuss their interpretation of these, perhaps to “keep the peace.”  The receiver may think she can avoid further conflict by not addressing this difference, although often this choice results in unexpressed conflict, which is covert conflict.  Covert conflict may seem preferable to overt conflict, but it really isn’t, usually at least.  There will still be a barrier in these friends’ relationship.

Judging is verbally and inappropriately evaluating what is being heard.  An example is a phrase such as, “I don’t think you really mean that, what you are really mean is that you don’t believe me!”  Most people do not want to feel judged when they are telling another person something; they want the message they are trying to deliver to be heard and, hopefully at least, understood.  Judging makes the relationship feel inappropriately unequal, putting the receiver of the message in the position of power.

Solving is jumping too quickly to solutions, taking the focus away from the speaker. Solving can be thought of as an extension of Judging, with the same negative consequences.  Solving isn’t collaborative, it is felt as “top down.”   When the speaker has the goal of being heard, solving becomes a distraction from that.  Parents of small children often have a legitimate reason for using “solving” language.  In some situations managers have a legitimate reason to use solving language when in conversation with their direct reports.  For most other situations, solving responses are less than effective.

Effective listening is such an important communication skill.  For many people, it isn’t easy, although too often it is thought of as such.  Effective listening requires focus and practice.  It also requires knowledge of the specifics discussed in this post.  I am interested in your thoughts about this, and your listening successes!

Patti signature

 

Posted in Relationships | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Which Do You Prefer, Platinum or Gold?

Part of the magic of my “It’s in the SAUCE®” personality assessment tool is that it provides data on how to communicate effectively with others, especially with those who have a different dominant communication style.  I began a discussion of personality differences in last week’s blog post, and promised to continue the discussion this week.   Personality differences are one variable involved in how we communicate.  How we communicate has a lot to do with how well we get along with others, or fail to.  Personality differences and communication are so important that I will devote several posts to this subject.

Let’s begin this week’s discussion with the Golden Rule, recognizing when it can be helpful, and when to consider other principles.  In its purest form the Golden Rule, that is, to treat others as you would like them to treat you, is positive and can provide a roadmap for communication and behavior.  If the communication is rooted in a respect for others, kindness, and other positive behaviors, the application of the Golden Rule isn’t necessarily problematic.  However, sometimes even when those ideals are present, the application of the Golden Rule does not result in the best communication for the recipient.

Take, for example, the common response of Millenials when someone says, “Thank you.”  I often hear them reply, “No problem!”  If you are a Boomer, perhaps you (like I) bristle.  To many Boomers, the proper response to “thank you” is “you’re welcome”, not “no problem”.  While I believe that each generation replying to “thank you” is usually intending to be respectful and kind, others may not hear the words used as representative of such.

Considering the significant diversity in our society, especially diversity of ethnicity and religion, the application of the Golden Rule may not always result in the most effective communication.  Although the Golden Rule is a commonly accepted philosophy in the U.S., we need to be more mindful of how we apply it, and at least consider if it works as well in a very diverse culture as does the Platinum Rule.

Dr. Tony Alessandra’s Platinum Rule, which is to “treat others the way they want to be treated,” may provide a more effective standard for communicating across varying cultures and generations.  A communication example can best differentiate the Platinum Rule from the Golden Rule.  Most people communicate from one of two basic communication styles: communicating in a direct manner or communicating in an indirect manner.  The differences in these styles are significant.  The person who communicates in a direct manner gets to his point quickly, uses “bottom line” talk, and definitive words.  Conversely, the person who communicates in an indirect manner uses verbal qualifiers that soften the message, for example, words such as “sometimes” or phrases such as “it seems that” or “in my opinion”.  Neither style is bad nor good; both styles can be effective when used appropriately.  If a direct communicator communicates from her natural style with a person who is naturally an indirect communicator, misunderstanding can occur.  The same is true when an indirect communicator communicates from his natural style with a direct communicator.

The context of the discussion, not just the communication preference or style of the other person, should guide whether the communicator uses direct or indirect language.  A workplace example related to tardiness illustrates this principle.  An excellent employee begins to exhibit tardiness in arriving to work.  In the first conversation with the employee, the manager could say, “John, on two of the last fifteen work days, you have been ten minutes late to work,” which is direct and true.  Or, the manager could say, “John, it seems that there has been some change in your normal pattern of being at work on time,” which is also true, but is a “softened” message.   If this is the first time that the manager notices a problem behavior in an excellent employee, perhaps the indirect approach is best, regardless of the employee’s dominant communication style.  On the other hand, if this encounter needs to be the first step in the disciplinary procedure, direct communication is probably best, regardless of the dominant communication style of the employee.  This example illustrates the importance of the context in selecting direct or indirect language.

Regardless of their own more dominant communication style, the most effective communicators communicate with others based upon the other person’s most dominant style.  This is an example of the Platinum Rule.  They also consider the context when making this decision.

In a recent visit to an Enterprise Car Rental location, I noticed these works printed on the wall: “We simply treat our customers the way they should be treated.”  This doesn’t necessarily have to pertain to just customers.  What about treating everyone the way they should be treated?  Do you think this idea is reflective of The Golden Rule, The Platinum Rule, or both?  Is it possible that the phrase is reflective of an even higher level of behavior than either the Golden Rule or Platinum Rule?  I would love to hear your thoughts on this topic.

Patti signature

Posted in Leadership, Relationships, SAUCE | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments